Thursday, November 15, 2012

Obesity and deep vein thrombosis



Obesity and Deep vein thrombosis

Obesity is measured as body mass index above 30. The body mass index (BMI) is measured as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meter. Obesity is associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Body mass index is a marker of excess weight and correlates well with body fat content in adults. Body mass index fails to consider the importance of the distribution of body fat. All measurements of obesity are predictors of the risk for VTE. Positive associations were found between VTE and body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference, and total body fat mass (1). The fact is that the fat distribution is not uniform in all the people and so there are different shapes of individuals. Basically obesity is differentiated as central or peripheral depending on the degree of fat accumulation in the central part of the body or extremities. Studies were done to find out the differences in risk associated with these types of fat distribution. The distribution of body fat predicts the risk of arterial thrombotic events, such as coronary heart disease (CHD). Central obesity is a better predictor of CHD than general obesity as measured with BMI.  Central obesity is measured as waist circumference or waist-to-hip ratio. It is important note that peripheral obesity is not a predictor of coronary heart disease. The peripheral obesity is measured as hip circumference (2,3). One study evaluated the association between VTE and central obesity in men and found that a waist circumference >100 cm was associated with a higher risk of VTE than a waist circumference  less than 100 cm (4).It is also important know the benefit of thrombo-prophylaxis in obese people who are undergoing major surgeries such as total knee arthroplasty. In a case-control study, they studied (130, 463) patient with and patients without acute VTE (within 9 days of surgery) and BMI ranging from 17 to 61.  Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors for postoperative VTE, adjusted for age and gender. Thromboprophylaxis was LMWH in 284 (48%), warfarin in 189 (32%), both in 55 (10%), and mechanical prophylaxis alone in 120 (20%). Overall, 77% ambulated on day 1 or 2 after surgery. Severe obesity was not a significant independent predictor for VTE and did not modify the beneficial effect of FDA-approved pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. Bilateral TKA and failure to ambulate by the second day after surgery were significant risk factors (5). 

References:
1.   Knut H. Borch, Sigrid K. Brækkan, Ellisiv B. Mathiesen, Inger Njølstad, Tom Wilsgaard, Jan Størmer, and John-Bjarne Hansen. Anthropometric Measures of Obesity and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism: The Tromsø Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:121-12.   
2.   Canoy D, Boekholdt SM, Wareham N, Luben R, Welch A, Bingham S, Buchan I, Day N, Khaw KT. Body fat distribution and risk of coronary heart disease in men and women in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition in Norfolk cohort: a population-based prospective study. Circulation. 2007; 116: 2933–2943. 
3.   Yang L, Kuper H, Weiderpass E. Anthropometric characteristics as predictors of coronary heart disease in women. J Intern Med. 2008; 264: 39–49 
4.   Hansson PO, Eriksson H, Welin L, Svardsudd K, Wilhelmsen L. Smoking and abdominal obesity: risk factors for venous thromboembolism among middle-aged men: “the study of men born in 1913.” Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159: 1886–1890.
5.   Sadeghi B, Romano PS, Maynard G, Strater AL, Hensley L, Cerese J, White RH. Mechanical and suboptimal pharmacologic prophylaxis and delayed mobilization but not morbid obesity are associated with venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty: A case-control study. J Hosp Med. 2012 Oct 5. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1962. [Epub ahead of print]


Monday, November 12, 2012

Blood goups and risk of proximal DVT


What is your blood group? if you have  O+  blood group, then you are probably safer than Non-O blood group people !!!

Non-O blood group in people seems to influence the risk of deep vein thrombosis.  In a study on 712 DVT patients, significant thrombotic risk was noted in those with Non O blood group and thrombophilia. In such patients the risk for DVT can be almost 3-fold higher.


Blood Transfus. 2012 Oct 11:1-5. doi: 10.2450/2012.0060-12. [Epub ahead of print]
ABO blood groups and the risk of venous thrombosis in patients with inherited thrombophilia.
Spiezia L, Campello E, Bon M, Tison T, Milan M, Simioni P, Prandoni P.
Although having a non-O blood type is now regarded as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism, the strength of this association is poorly defined, as is its interaction with inherited thrombophilia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:The prevalence of non-O blood group and inherited thrombophilia (deficiencies of natural anticoagulants, factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutation) was assessed in a series of 712 consecutive patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs who were referred to our Institution between 2004 and 2010, and in 712 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers. Odds ratios (OR) of DVT and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed for non-O group and thrombophilia, both separately and in combination.
RESULTS:A non-O blood group was present in 492 cases and 358 controls (OR 2.21; 95% CI, 1.78 to 2.75). A thrombophilic abnormality was present in 237 cases and 105 controls (OR 2.82; 2.18 to 3.66). The combination of non-O group and thrombophilia was present in 152 cases and 51 controls (OR 7.06; 4.85 to 10.28).
DISCUSSION:Having a non-O blood group is associated with an increased risk of proximal DVT of the lower limbs with or without pulmonary embolism. The addition of inherited thrombophilia increases the thrombotic risk conferred by non-O group alone by almost 3-fold.

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Why we are not preventing Diabetes?

Diabetes mellitus is going to affect the health of millions if it is allowed to continue to raise in the present manner and we are aware of this noncommunicable disease epidemic. There are some measures to delay the onset or prevent the diabetes mellitus. It is going to be essential to findout why these measures are not adequately implemented in the countries. There studies to find out the reasons for the indequate preventive measure implementation.

The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) clinical trial and its 10-year outcomes study (DPPOS), both sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), showed that certain interventions could prevent or substantially delay the onset of type 2 diabetes both safely and cost-effectively. Yet diabetes prevention is not widely practiced in the United States, and the disease's staggering human and financial costs continue to grow. It is therefore essential to identify the factors impeding the full realization of the DPP interventions' potential for preventing diabetes.

In DPP trial (3234) overweight or obese adults with IGT (prediabetes) were assigned to receive one of three interventions: lifestyle intervention aimed at modest weight loss through diet and exercise, treatment with generic metformin, or a placebo control. DPP findings published in 2002 indicated that, relative to placebo, lifestyle intervention and metformin reduced the rate of conversion to diabetes by 58% and 31%, respectively, over 3 years.1

Metformin worked well in younger women with history of gestational diabetes. Exercise and life style modifications worked well in people ( both genders) above 60 years of age.

Most DPP participants (88%) enrolled in the DPPOS ( 10 year study) , in which continued follow-up demonstrated that the 10-year risk reduction for type 2 diabetes was 31% for lifestyle intervention and 18% for metformin.2

We need to wait and see in India for the effectiveness of life style modifications in the rural and urban populations in preventing IGT conversion to diabetes mellitus, this can avert major risks associated with the potential epidemic of diabetes in the coming years.

Sunday, August 26, 2012

18F-Fludeoxyglucose PET/CT in the evaluation of large-vessel vasculitis

British Journal of Radiology (2012) 85, e188-e194 

18F-Fludeoxyglucose PET/CT in the evaluation of large-vessel vasculitis: diagnostic performance and correlation with clinical and laboratory parameters  N D Papathanasiou Correspondence: Dr Jamshed Bomanji, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK. E-mail: jamshed.bomanji@uclh.nhs.uk
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in patients with suspected large-vessel vasculitis and its potential to evaluate the extent and activity of disease.
Methods: 78 consecutive patients (mean age 63 years; 53 females) with suspected large-vessel vasculitis were evaluated with 18F-FDG PET/CT. 18F-FDG uptake in the aorta and major branches was visually graded using a four-point scale and quantified with standardised uptake values (SUVmax). According to clinical diagnosis, patients were classified into three groups: (a) steroid-naïve, large-vessel vasculitis (16 patients), (b) vasculitis on steroid treatment (18 patients) and (c) no evidence of vasculitis (44 patients). Analysis of variance and linear regression were used to investigate the association of 18F-FDG uptake with clinical diagnosis and inflammatory markers.
Results: 18F-FDG PET/CT was positive (visual uptake ≥2; equal to or greater than liver) in all patients with steroid-naïve, large-vessel vasculitis. The thoracic aorta, the carotid and the subclavian arteries were most frequently involved. 
Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET/CT can detect the extent and activity of large-vessel vasculitis in untreated patients and is unreliable in diagnosing vasculitis in patients on steroids.

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Metallo Beta lactamase producing pseudomonas aeruginosa and its association with diabetic foot.

Diabetic foot infections are common and there is increasing possibility that they are getting resistant to all antibiotics available due to inadequate or inappropriate use of them. Infection with multi drug resistance organisms (MDROs) is common in diabetic foot ulcers and is associated with inadequate glycemic control and increased requirement for surgical treatment.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains that produce metallo beta lactamases (MBLs) are becoming increasingly prevalent in wound infections

Indian J Surg. 2011 Aug;73(4):291-4. Epub 2011 May 3.

Friday, August 10, 2012

Residents vs attending surgeons

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patency: Residents Versus Attending Surgeons

Faisal G. Bakaeen, MD, Gulshan Sethi, MD, Todd H. Wagner, PhD,
Rosemary Kelly, MD, Kelvin Lee, PhD, Anjali Upadhyay, MS, Hoang Thai, MD,
Elizabeth Juneman, MD, Steven Goldman, MD, and William L. Holman, MD
Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Arizona Health Science Center, Tucson, Arizona; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University
of Minnesota Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System and University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama 

Background. Data are limited regarding the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts performed by residents versus attending surgeons.
 
Methods. We analyzed data from a multicenter, randomized Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study in which the left internal mammary artery was used preferentially to graft the left anterior descending coronary artery, and the best remaining coronary vessel received (per random assignment) either a radial artery or a saphenous vein graft. The study vessel’s 1-year graft patency was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included operative times, operative morbidity, mortality, repeat revascularization, cost, angina symptoms, and quality of life. Multivariate analyses were used to compare patient outcomes for residents versus attendings. 

Results. Residents were designated as primary surgeons in 23% of cases (167 of 725). Among the 531 patients who had a 1-year angiogram, study graft patency rates for resident cases (n 122) and attending cases (n 409) were not significantly different (86% versus 90%, p 0.22). Residents’ cases had longer perfusion time (119 versus 105 minutes, p < 0.0001) and cross-clamp time (84 versus 68 minutes, p < 0.0001). After risk adjustment, all outcome measures did not differ between the two groups, and there was no apparent interaction effect between resident/ attending designation and radial artery versus saphenous
vein use or on-pump versus off-pump approach.

Conclusions. Surgeons in training perform coronary artery bypass surgery without compromising graft patency or patient outcomes. Ongoing evaluation of residents’ performance and surgical outcomes is needed, given the major changes that are occurring in residency training.

(Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:482– 8) © 2012 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Thursday, August 09, 2012

Low-density lipoprotein lowering does not improve calf muscle perfusion, energetics, or exercise performance in peripheral arterial disease.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 30;58(10):1068-76.

Source

Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

We hypothesized that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) reduction regardless of mechanism would improve calf muscle perfusion, energetics, or walking performance in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

BACKGROUND:

Statins improve cardiovascular outcome in PAD, and some studies suggest improved walking performance.

METHODS:

Sixty-eight patients with mild to moderate symptomatic PAD (age 65 ± 11 years; ankle-brachial index [ABI] 0.69 ± 0.14) were studied at baseline and annually for 2 years after beginning simvastatin 40 mg (n = 20) or simvastatin 40 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (n = 18) if statin naïve, or ezetimibe 10 mg (n = 30) if taking a statin. Phosphocreatine recovery time was measured by (31)P magnetic resonance spectroscopy immediately after symptom-limited calf exercise on a 1.5-T scanner. Calf perfusion was measured using first-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with 0.1 mM/kg gadolinium at peak exercise. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography was graded. A 6-min walk and a standardized graded Skinner-Gardner exercise treadmill test with peak Vo(2) were performed. A repeated-measures model compared changes over time.

RESULTS:

LDL reduction from baseline to year 2 was greater in the simvastatin 40 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg group (116 ± 42 mg/dl to 56 ± 21 mg/dl) than in the simvastatin 40 mg group (129 ± 40 mg/dl to 90 ± 30 mg/dl, p < 0.01). LDL also decreased in the ezetimibe 10 mg group (102 ± 28 mg/dl to 79 ± 27 mg/dl, p < 0.01). Despite this, there was no difference in perfusion, metabolism, or exercise parameters between groups or over time. Resting ABI did improve over time in the ezetimibe 10 mg group and the entire study group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite effective LDL reduction in PAD, neither tissue perfusion, metabolism, nor exercise parameters improved, although rest ABI did. Thus, LDL lowering does not improve calf muscle physiology or functional capacity in PAD. (Comprehensive Magnetic Resonance of Peripheral Arterial Disease; NCT00587678).

Statins and Peripheral Arterial Disease

Based on the Heart Protection Study, persons with PAD should be treated with statins regardless of age, gender, or initial serum lipids levels. 

In addition to that  - Three double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies have also demonstrated that statins improve walking performance in persons with PAD.

In a study of 69 persons, mean age 75 years, with intermittent claudication, a mean ABI of 0.63, and a serum LDL cholesterol of 125 mg/dl or higher, 3 of 34 persons (9%) treated with simvastatin and 6 of 35 persons (17%) treated with placebo died before the 1-year study was completed . Compared with placebo, simvastatin significantly increased treadmill exercise time until the onset of intermittent claudication by 24% at 6 months and by 42% at 1 year after therapy. 

In a study of 354 persons, mean age 68 years, with intermittent claudication and hypercholesterolemia, at 1-year follow-up, compared with placebo, atorvastatin 80 mg daily significantly improved pain-free treadmill walking distance by 40% and significantly improved community-based physical activity. 

In a study of 86 persons, mean age 67 years, with intermittent claudication and hypercholesterolemia, at 6-month follow-up, compared with placebo, simvastatin 40 mg daily significantly improved pain-free walking distance and total walking distance on a treadmill, significantly improved the mean ABI at rest and after exercise, and significantly improved symptoms of claudication.

It is also interesting to note that Statin use is also associated with superior leg functioning independent of cholesterol levels and other potential confounders. The data suggest that non-cholesterol-lowering properties of statins may influence functioning in persons with and without PAD.

1. Aronow WS, Nayak D, Woodworth S, Ahn C. Effect of simvastatin versus placebo on treadmill exercise time until the onset of intermittent claudication in older patients with peripheral arterial disease at 6 months and at 1 year after treatment. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:711–2. 
2. Mohler ER, III, Hiatt WR, Creager MA., the Study Investigators Cholesterol reduction with atorvastatin improves walking distance in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Circulation. 2003;108:1481–6.
3. Mondillo S, Ballo P, Barbati R, et al. Effects of simvastatin on walking performance and symptoms of intermittent claudication in hypercholesterolemic patients with peripheral vascular disease. Am J Med. 2003;114:359–64.

Lancet. 2002 Jul 6;360(9326):7-22. 
MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Abstract  : Throughout the usual LDL cholesterol range in Western populations, lower blood concentrations are associated with lower cardiovascular disease risk. In such populations, therefore, reducing LDL cholesterol may reduce the development of vascular disease, largely irrespective of initial cholesterol concentrations.

METHODS: 20,536 UK adults (aged 40-80 years) with coronary disease, other occlusive arterial disease, or diabetes were randomly allocated to receive 40 mg simvastatin daily (average compliance: 85%) or matching placebo (average non-study statin use: 17%). Analyses are of the first occurrence of particular events, and compare all simvastatin-allocated versus all placebo-allocated participants. These "intention-to-treat" comparisons assess the effects of about two-thirds (85% minus 17%) taking a statin during the scheduled 5-year treatment period, which yielded an average difference in LDL cholesterol of 1.0 mmol/L (about two-thirds of the effect of actual use of 40 mg simvastatin daily). Primary outcomes were mortality (for overall analyses) and fatal or non-fatal vascular events (for subcategory analyses), with subsidiary assessments of cancer and of other major morbidity.

FINDINGS: All-cause mortality was significantly reduced (1328 [12.9%] deaths among 10,269 allocated simvastatin versus 1507 [14.7%] among 10,267 allocated placebo; p=0.0003), due to a highly significant 18% (SE 5) proportional reduction in the coronary death rate (587 [5.7%] vs 707 [6.9%]; p=0.0005), a marginally significant reduction in other vascular deaths (194 [1.9%] vs 230 [2.2%]; p=0.07), and a non-significant reduction in non-vascular deaths (547 [5.3%] vs 570 [5.6%]; p=0.4).  

The proportional reduction in the event rate was similar (and significant) in each subcategory of participant studied, including: those without diagnosed coronary disease who had cerebrovascular disease, or had peripheral artery disease, or had diabetes; men and, separately, women; those aged either under or over 70 years at entry; and--most notably--even those who presented with LDL cholesterol below 3.0 mmol/L (116 mg/dL), or total cholesterol below 5.0 mmol/L (193 mg/dL). The benefits of simvastatin were additional to those of other cardioprotective treatments. The annual excess risk of myopathy with this regimen was about 0.01%. There were no significant adverse effects on cancer incidence or on hospitalisation for any other non-vascular cause.

 

INTERPRETATION: Adding simvastatin to existing treatments safely produces substantial additional benefits for a wide range of high-risk patients, irrespective of their initial cholesterol concentrations. Allocation to 40 mg simvastatin daily reduced the rates of myocardial infarction, of stroke, and of revascularisation by about one-quarter. After making allowance for non-compliance, actual use of this regimen would probably reduce these rates by about one-third. Hence, among the many types of high-risk individual studied, 5 years of simvastatin would prevent about 70-100 people per 1000 from suffering at least one of these major vascular events (and longer treatment should produce further benefit). The size of the 5-year benefit depends chiefly on such individuals' overall risk of major vascular events, rather than on their blood lipid concentrations alone.

Wednesday, August 08, 2012


Vascular malformations in the forearm subcutaneous tissues can be completely excised. This video shows the excision of the Lymphovenous malformation on the lateral aspect of the upper and middle 1/3rd of the forearm in the cephalic vein zone.

Saturday, August 04, 2012

Age related differences in Endothelial response to smoke?


Buerger's disease in young men who started smoking in teen age!

In few countries Buerger's disease affecting the small blood vessels in the leg disappeared, but in the other countries it is still a problem. This disease is more often noted in the rural population or societies where childhood or teenage smoking is a problem. It gives us the suspicion that the endothelium may be responding in different ways depending on the age, but that fact was not tested and published till now. Here is one paper trying the test that hypothesis in rats.

Cigarette smoke causes oxidative stress in the lung resulting in injury and disease. The purpose of this study was to determine if there were age-related differences in cigarette smoke extract (CSE)-induced production of reactive species in single and co-cultures of alveolar epithelial type I (AT I) cells and microvascular endothelial cells harvested from the lungs (MVECLs) of neonatal, young and old male Fischer 344 rats.

Cultures of AT I cells and MVECLs grown separately (single culture) and together (co-culture) were exposed to CSE (1, 10, 50, 100%). Cultures were assayed for the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), hydroxyl radical (OH), peroxynitrite (ONOO(-)), nitric oxide (NO) and extracellular hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)). Single and co-cultures of AT I cells and MVECLs from all three ages produced minimal intracellular ROS in response to CSE. All ages of MVECLs produced H(2)O(2) in response to CSE, but young MVECLs produced significantly less H(2)O(2) compared to neonatal and old MVECLs. Interestingly, when grown as a co-culture with age-matched AT I cells, neonatal and old MVECLs demonstrated ~50% reduction in H(2)O(2) production in response to CSE. However, H(2)O(2) production in young MVECLs grown as a co-culture with young AT I cells did not change with CSE exposure. 

To begin investigating for a potential mechanism to explain the reduction in H(2)O(2) production in the co-cultures, we evaluated single and co-cultures for extracellular total antioxidant capacity. We also performed gene expression profiling specific to oxidant and anti-oxidant pathways. The total antioxidant capacity of the AT I cell supernatant was ~5 times greater than that of the MVECLs, and when grown as a co-culture and exposed to CSE (≥ 10%), the total antioxidant capacity of the supernatant was reduced by ~50%. There were no age-related differences in total antioxidant capacity of the cell supernatants. Gene expression profiling found eight genes to be significantly up-regulated or down-regulated. This is the first study to describe age-related differences in MVECLs exposed to CSE.
Microvasc Res. 2011 Nov;82(3):311-7. Epub 2011 Oct 6.


Thursday, May 31, 2012

Is there an urgent need to look for medicines (Drugs) to reduce the growth of aortic aneurysms and prevent their rupture?


The incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm increases as the advances. As the life expectancy is increasing more number of people are going to face the cardiovascular problems towards the later part of their life. In Tromso study 1 (Norway) an aneurysm (>29 mm) was present in 8.9% men and 2.2% women (p < 0.001) aged between 25-84 years of age. Aorta > 39 mm diameter was in 2.3% of men 0.4% of women aged between 25 to 84 years. The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm increased with age. In India with one billion people, we can assume that at least 10 million people will be at risk of aortic aneurysm development. It is considered that operations for aortic aneurysms are major and they are associated with high risk even in the best hospitals. The recently introduced Endorepairs (very expensive) are less invasive and considered to be associated with less pain, shorter hospital stay. But one would still ask for some medicine which can avoid intervention or operation if the aneurysms are detected early enough. So, this question of medical therapies is more relevant to us in India. On theoretical grounds, multiple medications can suppress AAA formation and subsequent expansion, reducing the risk of rupture or the need for surgical correction. However, none have been conclusively shown to reverse the pathology in the aortic wall or to have a clinically beneficial effect on slowing AAA growth. Because of potential side effects, many of these drugs remain of experimental interest only.

        However, despite the paucity of good clinical information, it would appear that there is sufficient experimental and observational evidence to support using some of these medications. It would seem appropriate to control elevations in blood pressure with ACE inhibitors or ARBs. In patients who are normotensive, either ACE inhibitors or ARBs could still be used in low doses provided patients can tolerate these medications. Addition of vitamin E should not be harmful and can be beneficial. COX-2 inhibitors in patients with concomitant arthritis or pain syndromes can have an additive benefit by reducing aneurysm expansion. Doxycycline is an inexpensive medication with few side effects. Statins should be considered in all AAA patients irrespective of cholesterol levels because of their pleiotropic effects, which might not only reduce AAA expansion but also improve overall cardiovascular risk. They can also benefit operative outcomes in patients who ultimately come to elective or emergency surgery.

Probably we can also think in terms of some kind of vaccination to prevent the progressive changes in the aortic diameter. It should become a mandatory thing in all the people above 50 years of age without smoking, above 30 year of age in case of smokers just like the vaccinations in paediatrics. The understanding at the genetic and molecular level may help us to find out a way to revert the aneurysmal changes in the aorta or its branches. It is important to invest money in this direction while continuing to think and develop mechanical solutions for the biological problems such as smooth muscle cell apoptosis, elastin degradation, inflammatory cell infiltration, synthetic abnormalities of collagen in the wall of the aorta. The proposed cost of treating the cardiovascular disease and aneurysmal disease in our country with mechanical (repetitive) means (stents and devices) is beyond imagination of the common man. So, there should be adequate encouragement, planning and funding for the development of such programs in Hospitals, Medical universities and other Educational institutions which can prevent non communicable diseases (NCDs).
[1] Reference: K Singh, KH Bonna, BK Jacobsen  et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in a population based study. Tromso study. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 154(3): 236-44

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Post lumbar puncture headache after varicose veins surgery

Headache is a complication of lumbar puncture that has been known for more than a hundred years. Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is characterized by the occurrence of a headache with a significant orthostatic component within 5 days of a lumbar puncture.
Patients after varicose vein surgery would like to go home on the same day or next day after surgery. But Varicose veins are generally operated under spinal anesthesia and if they develop head ache after surgery, their hospital stay gets prolonged . The incidence of head ache depends on a number of factors. Younger women with a previous history of headaches appear to be at highest risk. The incidence can be significantly reduced by using a thin lumbar puncture needle with an atraumatic tip. The condition is self-limiting and harmless, but leads to significant morbidity. Caffeine alleviates the symptoms and reduces the course of the illness. When bed rest and caffeine prove ineffective, an epidural blood patch works well for the majority, but there is no consensus on when such treatment should be offered. Headache frequently occurs after lumbar puncture for anesthesia in our hospitals. It is better to inform the patients about the same before surgery, so that their apprehensions can be relieved.  There is substantial evidence for recommending the use of a thin, atraumatic needle to reduce the incidence.