Saturday, July 04, 2020

Lupus anticoagulant


Lupus Anticoagulant and thrombosis, monitoring of anticoagulation
Thrombotic complications are limb threatening and life threatening.  There are multiple risk factors for thrombosis in the arteries and veins. Lupus anticoagulant is one of the risk factors for the development of thrombosis. Dr. Lockard Conley, haematologist discovered the Lupus Anticoagulant in 1947. The two words in this term are misnomers. This acts as an anticoagulant in the invitro and as procoagulant in vivo. It was first discovered in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus patient, but not seen in all patients with Lupus. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is see in 2-4% of the general population. Presence of LA increases the risk of thrombosis 3.6 folds.  LA is positive in 10-30% of the SLE patients. Lupus Anticoagulants are autoantibodies targeting phospholipids and proteins associated with phospholipids on the outer cell membranes. Patients with some infections or those taking certain medications can develop Lupus anticoagulants. Nearly, 20% of the deep vein thrombosis patients with or without pulmonary embolism are associated with antiphospholipid antibodies. The tests are done in 2 stages. At first PTT-LA, DRVVT are done. Then Anticardiolipin antibodies, Beta-2 glycoprotein1 antibody, anti-prothrombin antibodies are tested to confirm the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in patients.
It is important to give special attention to the monitoring of warfarin therapy in APS patients. We are concerned about the reliability of INR determinations in this group of patients with DVT/ PE. It was observed that in 6.5% to 10% of patients with Lupus Anticoagulant, antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) may prolong the prothrombin time assay leading to an unreliable INR.1,2,3  It is helpful to validate the INR in individual patients using a coagulation assay that is not affected by aPLs, suc as Factor II activity assay.4 After an APS patient is on warfarin with a stable INR of 2.0 to 3.0, an INR and factor II activity assay should be checked simultaneously. If the INR is in range and the factor II level is therapeutic (approximately 15% to 25%), the level of anticoagulation in adequate and the INR is reliable. If the INR is in range but the factor II level is >30%, the level of anticoagulation is inadequate. For such a patient, an individualized INR target range corresponding to a therapeutic factor II level should be established, or the factor II level itself could be followed.4

1.      Moll S, Ortel TL. Monitoring warfarin therapy in patients with lupus anticoagulants. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127: 177–185.
2.      Sanfelippo MJ, Sennet J, McMahon EJ. Falsely elevated INRs in warfarin-treated patients with the lupus anticoagulant. WMJ. 2000; 99: 62–64.
3.      Rosborough TK, Shepherd MF. Unreliability of international normalized ratio for monitoring warfarin therapy in patients with lupus anticoagulant. Pharmacotherapy. 2004; 24: 838–842.
4.      Kasthuri RS, Roubey RA. Warfarin and the antiphospholipid syndrome: does one size fit all? Arthritis Rheum. 2007; 57: 1346–1347.

Thursday, July 02, 2020

Impact of COVID-19 on vascular surgery practice



       Fig. Impact of COVID -19 on Vascular Surgery








The pandemic is still growing, but our knowledge of it also continues to improve. The outlook is optimistic considering that some patients have already been cured of it and a vast amount of knowledge has been gathered so far. Also, young doctors are incorporating this priceless experience into their personal and professional growth.





Vascular surgery: Elective surgery and outpatients 
Most arterial surgery is either urgent or emergency in nature and should continue at present where possible.  
Outpatients: Where possible, only urgent outpatients should be seen, and virtual clinics should be considered.
On discharge, many vascular patients will either need no outpatient follow (but be given a telephone number to ring if in trouble) or can be reviewed in remote outpatient clinics. 
Elective surgery: Elective arterial surgery and venous surgery should be deferred. Asymptomatic carotid surgery and surgery for claudication should be deferred. The size threshold for AAA surgery needs to weigh up risk of rupture in the next few months with risk of intervention and resource limitation. >7cm or imminent rupture AAA currently is recommended. 
Urgent/emergency vascular surgery
On call arrangements:  A second on-call consultant is advisable to help with both the emergency workload (and also if self-isolation becomes common). A vascular consultant surgeon should be on call and available to see all referrals. Trusts should consider having another vascular surgeon on call for delivering the surgery. 
Investigations 
Emergencies are likely to need a CT angiogram and proceed to surgery as appropriate. 
AAA: Ruptured aneurysms should ideally be treated by EVAR whenever possible to reduce dependence on the High Dependency Unit and reduce length of stay. Open surgery should only be considered when EVAR is inappropriate or unavailable and in cases where there is a good chance of success. ITU capacity will need to be considered prior to intervention. 
Critical leg ischemia / diabetic foot: Those legs immediately threatened require urgent intervention. Others may be diverted to a hot foot clinic for further assessment. Interventional radiological approaches may allow more appropriate utilisation of scarce high dependency beds. There may be situations where primary amputation may be more appropriate than complex revascularisations, multiple debridements and potential prolonged hospital stay.
Carotids: Crescendo TIAs would normally need urgent surgery. If there are severe resource limitations, aggressive best medical therapy more appropriate for recently symptomatic carotids.  
Spoke hospitals
Spoke hospitals allow patients to be cared for outside the hub. Currently, vascular surgical input is in the form of ward referrals, venous work, outpatient clinics, and angioplasties. These activities will need to be reviewed. There will need to be local flexibility, the but inpatient ward reviews, possibly in a virtual fashion may be appropriate. 
 Trainees
Surgeons in training will have keys roles to play in this crisis but the underlying principles of appropriate supervision, working practices, rest and pastoral care remain. 

Wednesday, July 01, 2020

Vitamin K and vascular calcification



In 1929 a Danish Biochemist work on the cholesterol metabolism in chicken fed on a low-fat diet, free from sterols lead to the discovery of Vitamin K. He noticed subcutaneous and intramuscular hematomas in the chicken fed on a low-fat diet for 6 weeks or more. When he re-fed them fatty food the hemorrhagic effect was not reversed. Instead, he fed them Hempseed and the hemorrhagic effect got reversed. So, he called this antihemorrhagic factor. In German, it is known as Koagulation–vitamin. It has got its name Vitamin K from Koagulation. Vitamin K1 (phylloquinone) is from plant-based foods and Vitamin K2 (MK7 menaquinone) is from other sources. Henrik Dam and Edward Doisy received Nobel prize 1943 for their discovery of Vitamin K.

Vitamin K2 is linked with vascular calcification. Vascular smooth muscle cells produce Matrix Gla Protein (MGP). Vitamin K acts as a cofactor for gamma-carboxylation of MGP after which it inhibits the vascular calcification. When the MGP gene was deleted from the rats there was complete arterial calcification and they died in 6 weeks. Similarly, when rats were treated with Warfarin, they developed vascular calcification. Treating them with high doses of Vitamin K, it resulted in reversal of the calcification.
It was observed that high doses of Vitamin K will reduce the arterial stiffness and increase vascular elasticity. This mechanical effect will improve cardiovascular functions. In a recent paper published, M K Shea et al 2020 (nearly 4000 patients) observed a relation between the all-cause mortality and serum levels of Vitamin K. When serum levels were lower than 0.5 nmol/ L, the all-cause mortality was 19% higher than the patients with higher levels (> 1.0 nmol/ L) of serum vitamin K in 13 years follow up. But surprisingly there was no such association noted between cardiovascular disease and serum levels of vitamin K.

We need more studies to understand the reversal effect on vascular calcification and improvement of haemodynamic effects in the calcified vessels. Currently we are treating diabetic patients with tibial arterial disease with guidewires, balloons and stents in addition to the statins, antiplatelets, CE/ARBs and antidiabetics. Vitamin K2 (menaquinone) induced correction of vascular calcification is an additional benefit to the patients, but this needs to be proved in more number of robust trials.  

M Kyla Shea, Kathryn Barger, Sarah L Booth, Gregory Matuszek, Mary Cushman, Emelia J Benjamin, Stephen B Kritchevsky, Daniel E Weiner. Vitamin K status, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a participant-level meta-analysis of 3 US cohorts. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Volume 111, Issue 6, June 2020, Pages 1170–1177,

Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Cerebral small blood vessel disease

Cerebral small blood vessel disease (in standard preoperative imaging reports) is independently associated with increased risk of CV death following carotid endarterectomy. This statement is produced by an article published in the European Journal of vascular and endovascular surgery2020.

1). What is cerebral small blood vessel disease?
Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is composed of several diseases affecting the small arteries, arterioles, venules, and capillaries of the brain, and refers to several pathological processes and etiologies. Neuroimaging features of CSVD include recent small subcortical infarcts, lacunes, white matter hyperintensities, perivascular spaces, microbleeds, and brain atrophy. The main clinical manifestations of CSVD include stroke, cognitive decline, dementia, psychiatric disorders, abnormal gait, and urinary incontinence.

2). What are cerebral small blood vessels?
Cerebral small vessels comprise two components. First, the leptomeninges vasoganglion, which is derived from subarachnoid space covering, and the convex surface of the brain. Second, perforating arteries are derived from anterior, middle, posterior cerebral arteries that supply the subcortical parenchyma. The cerebral small vessels are crucial to the maintenance of adequate blood flow to the sub-surface brain structure. They include small arteries, arterioles, venules, and capillaries which are commonly sized at 50–400 µm.

3). What are the outcomes of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) of the brain?
Small vessel disease accounts for up to 25% of all ischemic strokes but also put patients at twice the risk for these conditions. In addition, CSVD is a leading cause of functional loss, disability and cognitive decline in the elderly.

4). What are the neuroimaging findings of CSVD?

Neuroimaging of CSVD primarily involves visualizing recent small subcortical infarcts, lacunar infarct, WMH, microbleeds, enlarged perivascular spaces, and brain atrophy.

5). What are lacunar infarcts?
Gattringer and colleagues recommended the new term ‘recent small subcortical infarct’ instead of the lacunar infarct.
Gattringer T, Eppinger S, Pinter D, Pirpamer L, Berghold A, Wunsch G, Ropele S, Wardlaw JM, Enzinger C, Fazekas F. Morphological MRI characteristics of recent small subcortical infarcts. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(7):1037–1043.
Lacunar stroke accounts for up to a quarter of all acute ischemic strokes. it is a small fluid-filled cavity that was thought to mark the healed stage of a small deep brain infarct. In neuroimaging, a lacuna is a round or ovoid, subcortical, fluid-filled cavity with a similar signal to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). It measures between 3–15 mm in diameter, which is consistent with a previous acute small deep brain infarct or hemorrhage in the territory of one perforating arteriole. Lacunar infarcts are typically located in the basal ganglia, internal capsule, thalamus, corona radiata, centrum semiovale (CSO), and brainstem. Poirier and colleagues divided the lacunas into three subtypes based on the formation: Subtype I lacunas are secondary to old lacunar infarction; subtype II lacunas secondary to old hemorrhagic lesions; subtype Ⅲ lacunas are secondary to enlarged perivascular spaces. Herve and colleagues classified the lacunar lesions by three-dimensional MRI reconstruction, according to their shapes into four types: Slab, stick, multiple components, or ovoid/spheroid, then proposing that most of the lacunar infarcts (83%) were ovoid or spheroid. Infarct lesions manifest isolated, adjacent to or fused into white matter hyperintensity.
Moreau and colleagues found that lacunas almost always present at 90 days after acute lacunar infarction and appear as a central CSF-like hypointensity with or without a surrounding border of hyperintensity on FLAIR sequence but only CSF-like hypointensity and hyperintensity on T1-weighted and T2-weighted, respectively. Moreover, the sensitivity of FLAIR for cavitation was greatly lower than for T1-weighted sequences.

6). What is the effect of CSVD on people undergoing carotid endarterectomy?
The presence of SVD in pre-operative brain imaging reports can serve as a predictor for the three-year risk of cardiovascular death in symptomatic patients undergoing CEA but does not predict peri-operative or long term risk of stroke. Published: April 21, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.02.004



Sunday, June 28, 2020

Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF)

Vascular surgery patients with arterial problems generally require angiograms to evaluate the patency of the vascular lumen. There is always a concern about doing an angiogram ( CT angio or conventional angio) in those patients with decreased eGFR. Some times MRangiogram with gadolinium is recommended in. those patients. But that can result in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF).

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) incidence was found to be found to be 4.3 cases per thousand patient-years. When gadolinium is used in a patient there is 2.4% risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. NSF is also known as nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy. This was first described in 2006 in the Journal of American Society of nephrology by Marckmann P et al describing a case series of 13 patients. New contrast agents are introduced with the hope that they have a lesser risk of NSF. Gadobenate dimeglumine is one such newer agent. Clinically NSF looks like scleroderma and eosinophilic fasciitis but histologically it looks like scleromyxedema. Biopsy shows proliferation of dermal fibroblasts, dendritic cells, thickened collagen bundles,   increases elastic fibers and mucin deposition. Toll-Like Receptors (TLR) four and seven seems to play an important role in the development of NSF. 
Although NSF occurrence after exposure to newer GBCAs is very rare, the relatively scarce data among patients with acute kidney injury and those with risk factors for chronic kidney disease limit conclusions about safety in these populations (Joseph Lunyera 2020).
Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis Madke B, Khopkar U - Indian Dermatol ...